Statistical Physics Group

Team 106, Jean Lamour Institute

                     
Home
Where
Staff
Publications
Seminars
Workshops
Rencontres
Schools
International
Working groups
Positions
Teaching


Home

List of items of the menu:

All items are available in the left menu.

Home This page
Where How to reach our group
Staff List of group members, collaborators, and guests
Publications Publication list of the group
Seminars List of seminars, lectures, and defences in the group
Workshops List of workshops organized or co-organized by members of the group
Schools List of schools organized or co-organized by members of the group
International Exchange programs of members of the group
Working groups List of working groups where members of the group participate
Positions Offers of trainees, Ph.D grants and positions
Teaching Teaching material

Schedule

April 2017
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031 
Next seminar(s): Thursday 06 April 2017
10:25 : Intermediate-time dynamics in 
out-of-equilibrium spin chains (Maurizio Fagotti)
14:00 : Groupe "Connexions" : traduction Pauli 6/4/17 ( )
Export to the iCal format


The list of forthcoming seminars is also available via RSS and FeedBurner. (RSS,FeedBurner)

Last paper

A scientists' view of scientometrics: Not everything that counts can be counted
Kenna R., Mryglod O., Berche B.
Cond. Matter Phys. 20 (2017) 13803

Like it or not, attempts to evaluate and monitor the quality of academic research have become increasingly prevalent worldwide. Performance reviews range from at the level of individuals, through research groups and departments, to entire universities. Many of these are informed by, or functions of, simple scientometric indicators and the results of such exercises impact onto careers, funding and prestige. However, there is sometimes a failure to appreciate that scientometrics are, at best, very blunt instruments and their incorrect usage can be misleading. Rather than accepting the rise and fall of individuals and institutions on the basis of such imprecise measures, calls have been made for indicators be regularly scrutinised and for improvements to the evidence base in this area. It is thus incumbent upon the scientific community, especially the physics, complexity-science and scientometrics communities, to scrutinise metric indicators. Here we review recent attempts to do this and show that some metrics in widespread use cannot be used as reliable indicators research quality.


Top